Differences Between DO-178B and DO178C Training Systems You Would Like to Know
Aerospace is regarded as one of the complex subjects by many people these days. When software is added to the equation, the subject even get more confusing. When it comes to the aerospace subject, you can choose two different training systems. The two training systems that you can choose when you decide to take the subject I mentioned above are DO-178B and DO178C. The right training system to choose is not known by many people because they are different. But the difference between DO-178B and DO178C will be learned by those who will click this site. The two training systems are aerospace systems software development guidelines and this will be learned by those who will click for more here. An important role is played by DO-178B and DO178C training systems because they both guide companies and people developing avionics software.
Those two training systems I mentioned above can verify the safety and compliance protocols for aerospace software programs. Because of the important role played by both training systems, all the new systems are required by the national guidelines to follow either of them. Even though DO-178B and DO178C are two different training systems, changes are minor but important. The aerospace software industry accustoms those sorts of changes between the systems. Companies have to adapt to those changes if they want to remain at the top of their game. All guidelines and safety regulations have to be followed by aerospace software companies for them to stay informed about their products approval and distributions.
DO178C is a refined version of and DO-178B even if the training systems I mentioned above are different. But companies switching from DO-178B to DO178C system faces a lot of issues. For them to have a smooth transition, they need to know some important differences between the two training programs first. The committee addressed current software development and verification technology changes when DO-178B was being revised. Most of those changes they addressed were related to the software level. A software level is the hazard analysis rating system. The failures experienced by the software are classified in a five part system by the rating system.
The failure of the software is rated either catastrophic, hazardous, major, minor, or no effect by the rating system. The rating system describes the severity level of failure if a specific component fails mid flight when a company uses a piece of software for its airplane. The airplane can crash when failure is rated as catastrophic. When the rating system describes the failure as hazardous, a substantial negative impact might be experienced by the plane.
Recommended reference: over here